tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post6061281121939199125..comments2023-10-22T08:03:12.472-05:00Comments on GreenShift GERS - the unofficial site: MeetingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger34125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-28642144942520316642012-08-03T17:29:31.663-05:002012-08-03T17:29:31.663-05:00from the tpo website:
III. SALE OF A PROCESS
...from the tpo website:<br /><br /><br />III. SALE OF A PROCESS<br /><br />A claimed process, which is a series of acts or steps, is not sold in the same sense as is a claimed product, device, or apparatus, which is a tangible item. "'Know-how' describing what the process consists of and how the process should be carried out may be sold in the sense that the buyer acquires knowledge of the process and obtains the freedom to carry it out pursuant to the terms of the transaction. However, such a transaction is not a 'sale' of the invention within the meaning of § 102(b) because the process has not been carried out or performed as a result of the transaction." In re Kollar, 286 F.3d 1326, 1332, 62 USPQ2d 1425, 1429 (Fed. Cir. 2002). However, sale of a product made by the claimed process by the patentee or a licensee would constitute a sale of the process within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 102(b). See id. at 1333, 62 USPQ2d at 1429; D.L. Auld Co. v. Chroma Graphics Corp., 714 F.2d 1144, 1147-48, 219 USPQ 13, 15-16 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (Even though the sale of a product made by a claimed method before the critical date did not reveal anything about the method to the public, the sale resulted in a "forfeiture" of any right to a patent to that method); W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1550, 220 USPQ 303, 310 (Fed. Cir. 1983). The application of 35 U.S.C. 102(b) would also be triggered by actually performing the claimed process itself for consideration. See Scaltech, Inc. v. Retec/Tetra, L.L.C., 269 F.3d 1321, 1328, 60 USPQ2d 1687, 1691(Fed. Cir. 2001) (Patent was held invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) based on patentee's offer to perform the claimed process for treating oil refinery waste more than one year before filing the patent application). Moreover, the sale of a device embodying a claimed process may trigger the on-sale bar. Minton v. National Ass'n. of Securities Dealers, Inc., 336 F.3d 1373, 1378, 67 USPQ2d 1614, 1618 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (finding a fully operational computer program implementing and thus embodying the claimed method to trigger the on-sale bar). However, the sale of a prior art device different from that disclosed in a patent that is asserted after the critical date to be capable of performing the claimed method is not an on-sale bar of the process. Poly-America LP v. GSE Lining Tech. Inc., 383 F.3d 1303, 1308-09, 72 USPQ2d 1685, 1688-89 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (stating that the transaction involving the sale of the prior art device did not involve a transaction of the claimed method but instead only a device different from that described in the patent for carrying out the claimed method, where the device was not used to practice the claimed method until well after the critical date, and where there was evidence that it was not even known whether the device could perform the claimed process).<br /><br />http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2133_03_c.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-13306137478680092272012-08-02T00:22:55.392-05:002012-08-02T00:22:55.392-05:00neilbody 757 250 1132 1022 1012neilbody 757 250 1132 1022 1012Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-42702205781499941702012-08-01T19:57:46.966-05:002012-08-01T19:57:46.966-05:00all known facts are reflected in share price...pr...all known facts are reflected in share price...price keeps going downAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-43880577294223304952012-08-01T19:07:31.868-05:002012-08-01T19:07:31.868-05:00i didnt see icm state the date icm started spewing...i didnt see icm state the date icm started spewing its junk on the market. anybody know?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-66130291663962183772012-08-01T16:43:07.431-05:002012-08-01T16:43:07.431-05:00Can´t imagine you found some `new information` The...Can´t imagine you found some `new information` These past 6 years you found all the information you did not wanted to see when you invested.<br /><br />Difficult for you to understand the concept of DD, otherwise you would have known that before you threw in your first cent, what to expect. <br /><br />What is all the harping good for you´ll end up accusing other people off laughing at you.<br /><br />I have no problem with the way this ship is steered and steering and that has nothing to do with not wanting to see, but with having seen it already.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-52054020420514883162012-08-01T16:18:11.164-05:002012-08-01T16:18:11.164-05:00Anonymous 3:40, sorry to burst your bubble. Nobody...Anonymous 3:40, sorry to burst your bubble. Nobody is a professed liberal, which does explain a lot about his posts. As you say, "bashing, panic posts, twisted theories cloaked under the term objective questioning."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-62975440092188274112012-08-01T15:40:50.680-05:002012-08-01T15:40:50.680-05:00Geez Nobody, exaggerating small, useless details (...Geez Nobody, exaggerating small, useless details (like correct spelling) to avoid facing the blatant and large details (like constant bashing, panic posts, twisted theories cloaked under the term "objective questioning").<br /> <br />You sound like a republican candidate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-80223230089836222952012-08-01T15:24:09.168-05:002012-08-01T15:24:09.168-05:00I am glad you got that off your chest, now maybe y...I am glad you got that off your chest, now maybe you can look beyond your belief system and attempt to address reality. And what the heck is "rideric"? Gosh, GERS must have taken all your pennies as to not be able to own a spell-checker.nobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-24586893972207768342012-08-01T15:06:18.276-05:002012-08-01T15:06:18.276-05:00Still not sub penny I guess your sad about that no...Still not sub penny I guess your sad about that nobodyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-47312598497483161662012-08-01T15:05:09.294-05:002012-08-01T15:05:09.294-05:00There is no current demand for this stock because ...There is no current demand for this stock because only current investors know about it. <br /><br />Anyone that happens to stumble upon it just has to search up on any GERS board and see B.S. panic posts from Nobody, Tadaa, and the other losers, and that'll scare them away. <br /><br />Their panic posts and consistently negative views masked under their phrase "objective questioning" has to stop. <br /><br />So I'd say we don't need financing for the stock to go up. We just need some good PR and for the bashers like Nobody and Tadaa to stop posting their rideric everywhere, and this thing could really take off. <br /><br />Again, everyone, why would Nobody or Tadaa be invested in a company they have absolutely no faith in and constantly post about their lack of faith? Any normal person who actually thought that, would have gotten themselves out a long time ago. They wouldn't be constantly posting negative theories and spinning every little detail into a death march. They'd get out, and shut up. <br /><br />Why can't Nobody or Tadaa do that? Because there's obviously a hidden negative motive, all though not too hidden. But unless you're contantly on the boards reading posts, new onlookers are going to take them seriously. <br /><br />And anyone truly invested in GERS wouldn't constantly try to scare away new and current investors. It just doesn't make sense. <br /><br />Ugh, they really frustrate me!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-15938035698070221332012-08-01T14:56:59.533-05:002012-08-01T14:56:59.533-05:00If you do not change your view with new informatio...If you do not change your view with new information why attempt to find new information? You sound like the Catholic Church when confronted with the "news" that the earth was not the center of the universe.nobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-13335440969124983912012-08-01T14:53:02.990-05:002012-08-01T14:53:02.990-05:00I remember very clearly there was a Nobody touting...I remember very clearly there was a Nobody touting a settlement and not demanding the most from DvG.....<br /><br />You´re not laughed at for nothing, let that be a solace for you and your 4 way predictions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-13692777068934827342012-08-01T14:50:10.653-05:002012-08-01T14:50:10.653-05:00what broke the penny intraday....no demand for thi...what broke the penny intraday....no demand for this lovely pieceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-61776603927623919122012-08-01T13:30:31.979-05:002012-08-01T13:30:31.979-05:00priceline made william shatner rich...we are going...priceline made william shatner rich...we are going to be rich!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-18463128502958808842012-08-01T13:26:52.211-05:002012-08-01T13:26:52.211-05:00It seems like people keep forgetting, or are ignor...It seems like people keep forgetting, or are ignorant and think that Nobody is here for the investors, that GreenShift's income is RESIDUAL. <br /><br />The idea that the defendants will keep this litigation going until GERS goes bankrupt is rediculous. They have residual income each quarter from the license royalties, and are continuing, slowly, to gain more contracts, with more residual income. <br /><br />Where as a company like ICM is only making money at point of purchase, GreenShift is making continual income. And customers understand it's worth it's value as they are producing far higher yeilds than any of ICM's systems. <br /><br />GERS can afford to fight this for a long time. Defendants should realize the "run-em-down" tactic doesn't work on a company with high levels of residual income. <br /><br />If they're smart, the defendants will save themselves from going bankrupt and just settle. At this point, will all the evidence and failed prior arguments, it's inevitable that GERS will win this case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-31484974745972074102012-08-01T12:07:45.585-05:002012-08-01T12:07:45.585-05:00skunk thinks this should have a market cap of 2 bi...skunk thinks this should have a market cap of 2 billion..then that is a 40 dollar stock..i like itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-54931549366254371342012-08-01T11:40:01.911-05:002012-08-01T11:40:01.911-05:00God Nobody grow up! Just because your investment a...God Nobody grow up! Just because your investment and loss over the years didnt pan out doesnt mean that we all have to be brought down with you. Your just a bitter person that obviously is suffering from envy over patents that are good versus your failed products.... yes.. I have been hear on the blog for a long time and remember your bio before your delete it it a long time ago. How you had your own bio/green inventions and patent pending ideas and business that no one else wanted nothing to do with and your business. Get a job man and grow up. Sell your stock and go use your higher education to do something more than blog all day.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-55809064796027500862012-08-01T11:32:54.807-05:002012-08-01T11:32:54.807-05:00As a patent attorney and a stockholder I assure yo...As a patent attorney and a stockholder I assure you that this will go on for years. More times then not, the patent holder does not have the resources to continue the fight. I hope that Greenshift is the exception. There will be no willful intent or triple damages because I suspect all are operating with patent invalidity opinions. Let the courts do there job and the attorney's do there's. The rest is just folly and entertainment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-28867200319672561142012-08-01T11:31:31.735-05:002012-08-01T11:31:31.735-05:00I don't know, are you?I don't know, are you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-50380458184317957762012-08-01T11:14:20.301-05:002012-08-01T11:14:20.301-05:00Are the disciples finally departing?Are the disciples finally departing?nobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-13817166346763265382012-08-01T10:54:30.343-05:002012-08-01T10:54:30.343-05:0010:35 i have been reading and agree with you....bu...10:35 i have been reading and agree with you....but why no one able to swing real financing and dump this yag dilution approach to raising financing?...perhaps gers thinks winning will repair the dilution damage by repurchasing shares from the proceeds...no ideaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-16485953574733236902012-08-01T10:39:03.093-05:002012-08-01T10:39:03.093-05:00If you think that all the "money that they st...If you think that all the "money that they stole" is going back to the common shareholders if/when damages are paid; I have one word for you -- delusional. Where do you get that impression?nobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-23907994256302277192012-08-01T10:35:12.884-05:002012-08-01T10:35:12.884-05:00...i am a technician
who works for the defendants......i am a technician<br /> who works for the defendants.<br />I don't want to lose my job.<br />they said thats what would happen if we lost this case and had to pay back all the money we stole from GreenShift shareholders by not paying royalties to a multi-patent holder.<br /><br />Bank robbng is too dangerous cause they shoot back. <br /><br />Patent infringing is fun cause we get an unfair advantage over the rest of the industry and all we have to do is make the small company fold up by chasing away investors before the litigation is done.<br /><br />I think I will take my vacation in Jamacia this year.<br /><br />Oh and make sure you sell and do not invest here! I am counting on you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-84414055993167015982012-08-01T10:22:49.834-05:002012-08-01T10:22:49.834-05:00everyone has lost a fortune here...now the time li...everyone has lost a fortune here...now the time line of the litigation skedual cannot be met by new investors in the common market....a big clue...gers has had years to line up legitamate financing..no takers! ...none...save your money and earn no interest..that is a better choice....i am not a basher//...i am a technicianAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-80504389635534784332012-08-01T10:12:16.504-05:002012-08-01T10:12:16.504-05:00no buyers at any price defines down gap price acti...no buyers at any price defines down gap price action...no rush on this issue..yet/if everAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com