tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post2674761346714848555..comments2023-10-22T08:03:12.472-05:00Comments on GreenShift GERS - the unofficial site: One Example - 17 October?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-34915655778080838472011-08-26T11:57:44.457-05:002011-08-26T11:57:44.457-05:00however, markets tend to do the most unexpected th...however, markets tend to do the most unexpected things....the price may soar or sit stable post reverse split....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-62987113438355940912011-08-26T11:57:25.709-05:002011-08-26T11:57:25.709-05:00DISH,MSFT,RIM Tried The Same Thing And Failed...
...DISH,MSFT,RIM Tried The Same Thing And Failed... <br /><br />http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/06/dish-tries-to-get-patent-workaround-validated-sues-tivo.ars <br /><br />If ICM's "company policy is not to comment on matters in current litigation" and they're breaking this policy by commenting, I think that shows they're pretty freaking worried about the outcome. Knowing they have no hope in the court room, they try to sway the public/industry by making these comments. <br /><br />Looking at what happened in the DISH/TIVO patent infringement case, we can see ICM is trying the same tactics. <br /><br />--- <br /><br />"DISH tried countersuing, arguing that TiVo's patents were invalid." <br /><br />"ICM sued GreenShift in Kansas federal court...ICM remains confident that the GreenShift patents will be declared invalid." <br /><br />--- <br /><br />"DISH also requested that the US Patent and Trademark Office reexamine the patents, which were ultimately upheld in November 2007." <br /><br />Greenshift has done this. They asked the patent office to reexamine the patents, which they did, and were reissued as valid. <br /><br />-- <br /><br />So DISH tried to go around the patents with a patent workaround <br /><br />"DISH is adamant that its new DVR software doesn't infringe on any TiVo IP and says that the new lawsuit is a response to TiVo's "continued public statements" to the contrary." <br /><br />"Burris also reiterated that "ICM's new Advanced Oil System™ design and method clearly fall outside all patent claims of GreenShift Corporation's patents under any construction." <br /><br />--- <br /><br />Despite DISH being adamantly confident that TIVO's patents were invalid; that they had a new way to go around the patents; that they could sue the patent holder; in the end, they lost the case and were forced to pay $600 million in damages to the patent holder TIVO. They tried to sue, invalidate, intimidate, get a new patent...all the same things ICM is trying. <br /><br />--- <br /><br />"BlackBerry maker Research In Motion claimed to have a few workarounds ready in its patent dispute with NTP but ultimately settled the litigation for $612.5 million." <br /><br />Microsoft tried to invalidate software patents that they infringed, they lost their case as well. <br /><br />IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW BIG THE PATENT INFRINGER IS OR HOW SMALL THE PATENT HOLDER MAY BE, IN THE END, JUSTICE/PATENTS WILL PREVAIL... <br /><br />Good Luck To All!$!$!$Slashnutsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-45989850232986124972011-08-26T11:06:27.471-05:002011-08-26T11:06:27.471-05:00pretty sure the major buying op is after the rever...pretty sure the major buying op is after the reverse splitAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com