I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
Their entire argument debunked by our attorneys… How long before ICM files for Chap 11?
This Court held that, to invalidate the method claims-in- suit, the patentee must have either: (i) “made a commercial offer to perform the
patented method;” or (ii) “in fact performed the patented method for a promise of future compensation.” Id. To be a “commercial offer to perform,” the “offeror must be legally bound to perform the patented method if the offer is accepted.” Id. On summary judgment, this requires that the “agreement ... unambiguously require use of the patented method.” Id.
On behalf of GS CleanTech Corporation and Greenshift Corp. Steven B. Pokotilow Binni N. Shah Wesley A. Horner Stephen Underwood STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP Michael J. Rye Charles F. O’Brien Chad A. Dever Michele C. Perino Andrew C. Ryan Tasia E. Hanson CANTOR COLBURN LLP James P. Strenski CANTRELL STRENSKI & MEHRINGER, LLP Robert A. Carson David L. Newman Joseph P. Bonavita GOULD & RATNER
Now is when I (begrudgingly) state that several detractors have the thread of an important issue.
If KK were up-to-date on his filings and all that would mean relative to access to GERS' shares (brokerages allowing trading, etc.) and desirability of ownership, we would very likely see, in the near future, a modest to large explosion of the PPS. That near future would be the event that many of us have been predicting for a long time -- vindication upon appeal. However, the final vindication awaits further substantial court process and litigation until the damages are affirmed ($100s of millions of dollars) that will cause this to absolutely explode.
"For the foregoing reasons, and the reasons in CleanTech’s Opening Brief, the judgment for Appellees must be reversed, the judgment against Adkins must beaffirmed, and this case must be remanded for further proceedings."
But just the appeal reversal itself would make many of us wealthy IF KK does as he has pledged several months ago.
So now I add my voice, which has never been demanding, to the chorus -- Mr. Kreisler, the final brief of the appeal has been filed, there appears to be little reason to withhold any data now. Many of us (very) longs deserve your attention and consideration. Do what you have promised -- GET THE SEC FILINGS UP-TO-DATE, sooner than later.
I know that you read this blog and I hope that you take this message to heart.
That is one of the problems very few, perhaps only two, brokerages allowing trading in GERS. Get those filings up-to-date and many of these restrictions vanish and interest, good news, etc., can be translated much easier into gains in the stock price.
I of course, agree we want a higher stock price and that getting filings up to date would help that. However, isn't the reason we are not in compliance is to ward off the dilution with our creditors selling into any rise in price??
PS just got charlie schwab account and it works for gers.
Why would they sell if they had a tiger by the tail -- they are not stupid? The only way to wake that dead cat is with an infusion of SEC filings.
If KK waits (filing with the SEC) until the Federal Circuit reverses the lower court, and for the lower court to deliver the sanctions and for the sanctions to be acted on -- we could be many years away from any movement. Also consider that KK said that the filings would be up-to-date at the end of 2018 and the debt holders can always sell no matter what the PPS, thus that is a phantom fear.
No, the key is getting the SEC filings in, thereby increasing the brokerages that allow trading in GERS, creating a demand for GERS' stock. Then there is no need to fear those dastardly debt holders. In that case (filings up-to-date), if they want to dump their shares for a few cents a share I will be buying them, won't you?
Nobody - on it. Our updated and current goal is to be current well before a decision is rendered.
Our research team has made some recent strides in adjacent technology portfolios that are nearing commercial feasibility. Growth with any one of these processes requires us to be current in line with elimination of the last of our pre-crash debt irrespective of the corn oil saga - especially the CO2-to-Ethanol processes.
The Clerk of Court told us today that the oral arguments could occur in a two to three month range from now-- depending on other non -anticipated events. If that happens perhaps we can meet at the Hay-Adams this summer?
so what does this exactly means? What is the next step?
ReplyDeleteCompelling arguments, defendants are in trouble here.
ReplyDeleteI love how GERS' debunked the claim of being reduced to practice in June/July of 2003.
Thanks SkunK!
Good Luck To All!$!$
Their entire argument debunked by our attorneys… How long before ICM files for Chap 11?
ReplyDeleteThis Court held that, to invalidate the method claims-in-
suit, the patentee must have either: (i) “made a commercial offer to perform the
patented method;” or (ii) “in fact performed the patented method for a promise of
future compensation.” Id. To be a “commercial offer to perform,” the “offeror must
be legally bound to perform the patented method if the offer is accepted.” Id. On
summary judgment, this requires that the “agreement ... unambiguously require use
of the patented method.” Id.
The whole team came to bat:
ReplyDeleteOn behalf of GS CleanTech Corporation and Greenshift Corp.
Steven B. Pokotilow
Binni N. Shah
Wesley A. Horner
Stephen Underwood
STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
Michael J. Rye
Charles F. O’Brien
Chad A. Dever
Michele C. Perino
Andrew C. Ryan
Tasia E. Hanson
CANTOR COLBURN LLP
James P. Strenski
CANTRELL STRENSKI & MEHRINGER, LLP
Robert A. Carson
David L. Newman
Joseph P. Bonavita
GOULD & RATNER
Now is when I (begrudgingly) state that several detractors have the thread of an important issue.
ReplyDeleteIf KK were up-to-date on his filings and all that would mean relative to access to GERS' shares (brokerages allowing trading, etc.) and desirability of ownership, we would very likely see, in the near future, a modest to large explosion of the PPS. That near future would be the event that many of us have been predicting for a long time -- vindication upon appeal. However, the final vindication awaits further substantial court process and litigation until the damages are affirmed ($100s of millions of dollars) that will cause this to absolutely explode.
"For the foregoing reasons, and the reasons in CleanTech’s Opening Brief, the judgment for Appellees must be reversed, the judgment against Adkins must beaffirmed, and this case must be remanded for further proceedings."
But just the appeal reversal itself would make many of us wealthy IF KK does as he has pledged several months ago.
So now I add my voice, which has never been demanding, to the chorus -- Mr. Kreisler, the final brief of the appeal has been filed, there appears to be little reason to withhold any data now. Many of us (very) longs deserve your attention and consideration. Do what you have promised -- GET THE SEC FILINGS UP-TO-DATE, sooner than later.
I know that you read this blog and I hope that you take this message to heart.
It means buy more stock that's the next step. Because when they win this will be dollars.
ReplyDeleteThat is one of the problems very few, perhaps only two, brokerages allowing trading in GERS. Get those filings up-to-date and many of these restrictions vanish and interest, good news, etc., can be translated much easier into gains in the stock price.
ReplyDeleteNobody,
ReplyDeleteI of course, agree we want a higher stock price and that getting filings up to date would help that. However, isn't the reason we are not in compliance is to ward off the dilution with our creditors selling into any rise in price??
PS just got charlie schwab account and it works for gers.
Why would they sell if they had a tiger by the tail -- they are not stupid? The only way to wake that dead cat is with an infusion of SEC filings.
ReplyDeleteIf KK waits (filing with the SEC) until the Federal Circuit reverses the lower court, and for the lower court to deliver the sanctions and for the sanctions to be acted on -- we could be many years away from any movement. Also consider that KK said that the filings would be up-to-date at the end of 2018 and the debt holders can always sell no matter what the PPS, thus that is a phantom fear.
No, the key is getting the SEC filings in, thereby increasing the brokerages that allow trading in GERS, creating a demand for GERS' stock. Then there is no need to fear those dastardly debt holders. In that case (filings up-to-date), if they want to dump their shares for a few cents a share I will be buying them, won't you?
Nobody - on it. Our updated and current goal is to be current well before a decision is rendered.
ReplyDeleteOur research team has made some recent strides in adjacent technology portfolios that are nearing commercial feasibility. Growth with any one of these processes requires us to be current in line with elimination of the last of our pre-crash debt irrespective of the corn oil saga - especially the CO2-to-Ethanol processes.
The Clerk of Court told us today that the oral arguments could occur in a two to three month range from now-- depending on other non -anticipated events. If that happens perhaps we can meet at the Hay-Adams this summer?
ReplyDelete