Letter Expert Status Conference
SEE HERE
SkunK
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Saturday, December 21, 2013
For ICM’s Eyes Only
All ICM electronic data shall be treated by Transperfect as “Highly Confidential – For ICM’s Eyes Only, pending ICM’s review. . .
Plaintiff’s counsel shall be entitled to have access only to data designated by ICM for production to Plaintiff . . .
SEE HERE
Extension Granted
SkunK
Plaintiff’s counsel shall be entitled to have access only to data designated by ICM for production to Plaintiff . . .
SEE HERE
Extension Granted
SkunK
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Tag Along Argument Rejected
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Defense Expert Report
It is my opinion that it is probable that the VDT July 31 letter (Q1) was not created and signed on the purported date of July 31, 2003 . . .
suggesting that the two documents were not prepared contemporaneously.8
The unsigned VDT July 31 letter (K1) sent via email on August 1, 2003 and the signed VDT July 31(Q1) letter are in different formats (due to the different logos)
An ink dating examination of the non-ballpoint writing ink using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis was not feasible since the VDT July 31 letter (Q1) was signed more than six months prior to my receipt of the letter for forensic analysis.
A blue non-ballpoint writing ink was used to produce the David Cantrell signatures on page 2 of the VDT July 31 and page 3 of the VDT August 19 letter. The ink matches a formulation manufactured by Pilot Pen Corporation, which has been used in their pens since the 1990s and still remains widely available. Based on the commercial availability of the writing ink, no opinion can be given as to the date the signature was made.
Friday, December 13, 2013
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)